-
Donate
Type donation amount in box below.
IMPORTANT! If you donate via PayPal using an e-mail address different than the one you are currently using on USMF and would like a 2024 Donor Icon added to your account, you MUST CONTACT vintageproductions or stratasfan and let them know what email address was used for the donation.
Thank you for supporting USMF.
Donate Sidebar by DevFuse -
Recent Posts
-
-
By Cobra 6 Actual · Posted
Just wanted to mention that Zippo also made belt buckles, usually for Navy ships. Here’s an example: In new condition these usually sell on eBay for ~$25 to ~$50. -
By JohnK83882 · Posted
Probably civilian buttons but the near spherical shape suggests military. (It's the spheroid buttons that caused brits to call the soldiers wearing them doughboys, the British term for a round food made of dough maybe like hush puppies.) An old post says the backmark, Waterbury Co's Inc. started in 1944. WateWater -
By Chuckman1108 · Posted
It was also THE bag for Special Forces. In fact, they carried that bag in canvas through the 80s. -
By R.A.Watkins · Posted
Although often mislabeled as a Tank Destroyer unit, the 68thTank Battalion served in combat in the ETO as part of the 6th Armored Division. Campaign credits include; Lorient, Nancy, Battle of Bulge, and the Siegfried Line. The first attachment depicts the 68th's 'Toby Tortoise' emblem designed for the unit by Disney Studios. The 68th's official tactical marking was a white triangle and numerical designation painted on the hull of their M4 Sherman's. There were however numerous M4's within the battalion that were known to have additionally affixed the 68th's 'Toby' insignia to the hull as well (image #2). I'm looking for any images showing the wartime use of this emblem (vehicles, stationary, signage, et al.), so if you happen to have anything along these lines I would sure appreciate you posting it here. Thanks for looking. -
By mikie · Posted
Well it’s good to see someone getting up in the world. Climbing ladders is NOT my thing. No way I could climb that thing if I wanted to. Which I don’t. By a coincidence, there are large ugly street trees at my office that are constantly shedding bark and branches. Besides making a mess on the street, sidewalks and parking lot, a branch occasionally falls down and damages some above ground water pipes and meters strategically and brilliantly located directly below the tree. The roots are also damaging the plumbing. It took the tree causing major water leaks twice since new years for the city to finally decide to take it down. Of course the municipal idiocrasy decided to leave intact the equally destructive tree about six feet away. I love trees but the choice of whatever species this is and their location was just plane stupid. About par for our city planners. mikie -
-
By opseccc · Posted
Hay all, I am looking for a magazine article that I read years ago about the BenchMark Gerber TAC-II knife. The article had pictures of the prototype knife with 000000 serial number. If anyone knows about this article, please let me know the magazine it was in and the date of it? I have examples of the TAC-I & TAC-II that Gerber produced. I am not a BenchMark expert so if you have knowledge and information that is different than mine, I am open to learning more. Gerber purchased the BenchMark Knives company in 1984. BenchMark was a Knife company in Gastonia, North Carolina. It was started in 1978 by Black Collins. He sold the company to Jenkins Metal Corp. at some point before Gerber purchased the knife making equipment and stock. Gerber sold it back to Jenkins in 1991 and it operated under the name, Hunting Classics Ltd./BenchMark Knives. The company closed in 1996 and sold again in 1997. This is where my knowledge of the company ends, but the name has gone on. Under Gerber, they sold several models like the SOS knife, Ninja, Moray, SS-III, 3 hunting fixed blade knives and Rolox series knives. My focus is with the TAC series knives. After Gerber sold BenchMark back in 1991 the TAC knives continued, but only kept the overall handle. The unique securing mechanism was no longer used and several different blade shapes were used. Many are confused by calling these knives Gerber’s, but if does not gave “Gerber” stamped on the blade, it is not a Gerber. Gerber made the TAC-II prototype using Black Collins original design. The Prototype differed from the initial production knifes, in three ways. The blade was darkened, but 440 stainless steel is hard to darken. The pommel on the prototype was solid steel shaped similar to the handle shape. The serial number fell under Gerber’s 000000, like the Mark II prototype test pieces. The production knifes used a serial number starting with the letter A and having 5 numbers starting with A01000. Other than these three differences, the prototype was the same as the production TAC-II. Gerber also initially made the knife with a green handle and sheath, but ended their production in the first year. At some point, the initial stock from Benchmark was exhausted and Gerber continued the TAC-II with minor changes. The blade profile changed slightly with the grind lines close to the handle, being similar to the rest of Gerber’s full double edged survival knives. The design of the upper portion of the sheath also changed. The original TAC knives had an added piece with two military ALICE clips for securing to military equipment. The new design used the Gerber-Bianchi belt attachment that was used on several other Gerber sheaths at the time. Also, the handle securing strap was raised to the top of the sheath. This has been long winded, but if you would like to know more, just ask. Also, show off your TAC knives and tell us any interesting stories of their use. if you know of the article I am looking for, please let me know. -
By Randy · Posted
Johnny. you might be thinking about this one, a better know design. The anti-SAM mission was called Iron Hand, thus the mailed fist on the patch. Randy -
-
-
-
-
* While this forum is partially supported by our advertisers, we make no claim nor endorsement of authenticity of the products which these advertisers sell. If you have an issue with any advertiser, please take it up with them and not with the owner or staff of this forum.